Grammar
Language/Word Development
Currently, we understand and define the idea of Grammar as the system and structure of language.
— The idea of Language | is understood as how words are used
to communicate.
— The idea of Words | are made up of a combination of letters
which produce a reference to a particular meaning.
Construct of Words
To verify and clarify the meaning of a particular word, we also have dictionaries to look up definitions. Additionally, there are etymology dictionaries to look up the history and cultural influence of a word.
When researching the etymologies of words, one common occurrence that can be observed is the concept of a figure of speech and how it relates to explanation of meaning.
Example: The “Etymology” of the English word: Grammar
— from late 14c Latin, Grammar – meaning: Rules of [letters/language]
— from 12c. French, Grammaire – meaning: Magic of [letters/language]
Note: Also, from here – into: Grimoire – meaning “Book of Magic”
— from older Greek, Grammatike – meaning: Art of [letters/language]
One feature of reviewing how words were understood is noticing the fluid nature of the perception of meaning and its relationship to time and the influence of culture(s).
The shift in perception and understanding of words [or the variants of them] appears to have a direct correlation to the time period and the people’s way of life (culture). When researching word origins, there is a noticeable layering effect, like the geography of the layers of rock in canyon walls tells their story of development, or in archaeology, excavating down unearths layers of time and cultures that had built settlements upon settlements.
The idea of using the concept of figure of speech to assist (or guide) in generating visual imagery that compares one thing to another as a method to transmit and understand a concept (idea), and as a method to bring clarity to a perspective of thought.
As language developed over time, words shifted and expanded in an attempt to improve the precision of thought and communication. The development of words narrowed to more individual and specific associations to objects or concepts, but traces of the original, figurative relationship can still be found.
The linguistic attempt to develop a degree of precision in words and meaning has been layering (and evolving) over time and has created a feature of perception [of “what was once the past understanding is a hidden perspective of meaning.”]
Note: As a method of describing this process of a single starting point, layering over time and being hidden, an appropriate figurative comparison would be to link it to development of a “pearl”, which begins as a single grain of sand and ironically begins as an irritation of a foreign body, but grows and develops into something which is eventually viewed as both valuable and beautiful. — by extension, to understand the growth of the pearl “of words” is to know their “Etymology.”
Perception of Language
As an understanding of the concept of “figure of speech” in the culture of farming, which is also noticeable in the imagery of the Glyphs, another similar relationship and connection to meaning is found within Kabbalah, where they are described as the Seeds of Creation.
Note: The “Etymology” of the English word: Culture
from mid-15c., “the tilling of land, act of preparing the earth for crops,”
from Latin cultura – meaning: “a cultivating, agriculture,”
figuratively “care, culture, an honoring,”
The fact that the farming motif is the dominant function, with some overlapping connections to nomadic (shepherding), fishing, and hunter-gatherer activities and attributes. These motifs represent the nature of human living as the “Life they Live.”
Note: The correlation to the farmer motifs, as over-taking the nomadic or shepherding motifs, is reflected in the story of Cain (Tiller of Soil) killing and burying his brother, Abel (the Shepherd). — Symbolically, the “killing aspect” refers to a greater focus on farming motifs, in relation to the language structuring, and the “burying aspect” implies the intentional shift and may have happened slowly over time.
Development of Language
Expanding on the idea of the farming motif relationship to language development.
Format perspective as:
The process of the tiller of the soil is the preparation of the soil for the planting of the seeds, which will become the crops.
The crops | the outcome or the idea of an end product = as symbolic of the concept of Language.
The seeds [the raw materials] = as the Glyphs/Letters.
As a method of word building, aligning with the symbolic process of seed development would be a logical structural formatting choice.
Seed Construct
The current description of the Hebrew language is described as primarily based on a function of trilateral roots, or 3-letter root words [based on consonants, which correlate to the letters of the Hebrew Alphabet (as consonants, not vowels)]. Although most roots in Hebrew seem to be trilateral, many of them are bilateral (2-letter roots).
The concept of root words may describe an observed pattern regarding how the language is structured, but this does not explain why the roots were developed. As a premise of the developing structure, a link to the pattern of a seed transitioning into a seedling can be observed in a three-stage format.
The key stages are:
— The first stage: the “Dry Seed”
[“Seed Dormancy” or the “Dormant Seed” = Dehydrated Seed | the plant-life version of hibernation of the seed].
— The second step: the “Watered Seed”
[Re-hydrated Seed] or the watering as an “external” influence to initiate seed growth — the “what sparked it into life” — to motivate it to fulfill its potential – [maybe even the concept of re-birth or renewed awakening!] as the “Watered Seed.”
— The third stage: the “Sprouting Seed”
[is the sprouting of life that comes from the seed.]
The basic three-step process can be described as reflection of the Path of the Seed = The Seed’s Journey, and also correlates to the word development structure as a construct of word building:
as Structure
1 – “Dry Seed” — directly relates to a 1-letter (or glyph)
2 – “Watered Seed” — directly relates to a 2-letter roots
3 – “Sprouting Seed” — directly relates to a 3 letter roots
Also, as reflecting the Concept of “Cause and Effect” – [as coming from the “First Cause” – the concept of the Mind of God (Aleph)
as Concept
1 – “Dry Seed” — Concept of Potential
2 – “Watered Seed” — Concept of Inspiration
3 – “Sprouting Seed” — Concept of Outcome
If this pattern is continued and repeated as a layered process of time, it can be expanded to another level of a correlated (or reflected) structure. Following the process of the development of a seed into a plant.
As the second cycle of the 3-stage model
The Flower’s Journey,
as “The Flower to Fruit Path”
as Structure
4 – “Flower” — relates to 4-letter words
5 – “Pollinating Flower” — relates to 5-letter words
6 – “Fruit” — relates to 6-letter words
Also, as reflecting the Concept of Life:
as Concept
4 – “Flower” — Concept of Plant-life
5 – “Pollinating Flower” — Concept of Reproduction [Birth/Rebirth]
6 – “Fruit” — Concept of Animal/Human-life
As the third cycle of the 3-stage model
The Adam’s Journey
as “The Path of Life”
[In regard to “Animal/Human Life” versus “Plant-life”]
as Structure
7 – “Adam” — relates to 7-letter words
Note: The first 7-letter word used in Genesis 1:16 is הכוכמימ (HKVKMYM) translated as: stars — which are also structured as the 12 constellations.
8 – “Adam & Eve” — relates to 8-letter words
Note: The first 8-letter word used in Genesis 1:14 is ולמועדימ (VLMVaDYM) translated as: seasons — which in Ancient Mesopotamia conceptualized two seasons: summer and winter. (The Babylonian calendar, used in Mesopotamia, was based on a year of 12 synodic months.)
9 – “Offspring” — relates to 9-letter words
Note: It’s noted that there are no 9-letter words in Biblical Hebrew. Although, it’s interesting that human pregnancy = 9 months.
as Concept
7 – “Adam” — Concept of Oneness
[as Mankind/Humans = Dry Seed or Full of Potential]
8 – “Adam & Eve” — Concept of Union/Re-Union
[Male-Female] = Adam/Eve [When Humans come together, we become Inspired]. Also, this connects to the triggering of Pollination, when pollen from a male anther is transferred to the female stigma of a flower.
9 – “Offspring” — Concept of Family
[When Humans take action, it’s born from Potential + Inspiration – or when the two come together, action is born)
Note: The Result is the pattern of three (3) and layering of the pattern of 3 on top of 3 on top of 3, or the pattern or concept of 3-6-9.
There is a basic relationship between the two aspects of structure and concept that functions like the idea of a shape having the boundary line that contains it and the pattern it presents.
In other words, it’s the stagnant, internal reflective nature of a thing, but when the movement [growing or flowing aspects] gets introduced, it will group [as an interaction of a set] in aspects of three.
Note: This pattern also functions similarly to the idea of spirit or mind aspect and the relationship to the flesh or body aspect – the concept of the flesh as the boundary line containing a spirit [of a person].
The “Glyph” Grammar
As of now, the focus has been on the concept of structure, specifically the constructs of seeds and journeys (paths), which are formatted in pattern sets of three (3) or “constructs of three.”
There is another attribute connected to a structure, which is related to its function and actions (efforts), and this is referred to as the system.
When analyzing Biblical Hebrew writing in Genesis, another set of patterns was observed. These were functioning in what I break down as a set of four processes or a “Construct of Four.”
Note: Additionally, they’re layered and build upon themselves.
The idea is that when both groups of these patterns are combined or interwoven, they become the system and structure we define as Grammar, or in this case, what I referred to as the Glyph Grammar.
Note: The primary reason I refer to it this way is because of the Figure of Speech of Alliteration, not because of the actual functioning of the time period of the use of the Glyph type language format.
The following explanation of patterns and the breakdown into 4 segments of a process format is only a portion of the complexity of usage and function.
Process 1 = The Reflective Nature [the reflection of One]
Process 2 = The “Effort” of [coming from] One becoming Two
Process 3 = The “Offspring(s)” [the Born from(s)] | “The Tethering”
Process 4 = The “Interaction” with One becoming Two —
“The Union” of “The Tethering” and “The Effort”
Process 1
The Reflective Nature
The first process of the Glyph Grammar’s function is the concept of reflection. Overall, I consider this aspect to be the most utilized and embedded in regard to both ancient word-building and scripture.
The idea of reflection can be understood in various ways. At its core, it represents the relationship of duality, “two,” yet connected to a singular, “one” source. This is easily understood as seeing one’s own reflection, for example: “in a mirror” or “on the surface of the water.”
The One, as the One’s reflection concept.
Described as the observable result of seeing one’s own reflection, also an explanation of a degree of clarity in defining what is being reflected.
The idea is that this relationship between the “source object” and its reflective result compares conceptually to that of a three-dimensional object (which is being reflected as the two-dimensional representation of it).
There is some variability in this attribute. The first is that the reflection is similar but not exactly the same. There are differences, such as being flipped versus reversed or two-dimensional versus three-dimensional, but also the state of seeing one’s own reflection, which requires a light source versus no light source (darkness).
Note: This aspect is represented in Genesis 1:2 as: Describing the Earth as formless, void, and that darkness over the face[surface] of the deep. And the Spirit of God was hovering over the face[surface] of the waters. In Genesis 1:3, And God said, “Let there be light and there was light.”
Conceptually, and at the simplest level, this is representing being in front of a reflective surface, but in the dark [unable to see or hidden in the dark], then turning on a light source, which will make it possible to see one’s own reflection.
This is an attribute of the formula of reflection (and of “Creation”), which is also repeated as a multiple “dividing/separating,” but then leads to a “gathering/collecting.”
Note: from Genesis 1:4 – describes a series of dividing/separating events… but 1:9 – the gathering of waters to let the land appear (again as if the lights turned on and one can see their reflection). And again, the idea of a separate thing, but from within the first thing — the waters and the land reflecting the other. Then, it continues the “dividing/separating” and “gathering/collecting” in 1:10 with the waters, as the Sea.
— But now 1:12 on the Earth, there is the “dividing/separating” as stages of types of bringing forth(s) or as “gathering/collecting” — of the Grass yielding Herb “Seed” | The Tree yielding Fruit “Seed within” [Symbolizing, a Branching effect of the “dividing/separating” — becoming Greater as it develops from the Lesser] The denotation of direction of reflection as, The Lesser to Greater.
— and in Genesis 1:14 the Sky aspect [as the Above the Earth] is related in the same way. Denotes the direction (and position) of the reflected as the Greater to the Lesser, but with reference to the Light.
The concept of reflection is: The Greater & the Lesser | or simply a “Lesser” version of the “Greater” one.
Note: In Genesis 1:16, This is used as The Greater Light and Lesser Light (often understood as the Sun and the Moon – which are separate objects but has the common element of the One, which is the light = The Sun and the Light are directly connected and the Moon only reflects the Sun’s light — Sun=(producing it’s Light) and Moon=(reflecting Light of the Sun).
There is a generalized concept of everything as either coming from or branching from [as the “Extension” of] the “One” source but divided into a series of greater and lesser segments, like a Tree with various degrees of branches/branching — the idea that everything is related as a “Oneness.”
Another attribute of a light source, or when adding light to anything, is the duality of reflection: towards ourselves, like the mirror, as either external or internal.
The idea of seeing one’s own reflection is also a concept of self-reflection [the look at oneself, as an internal direction].
-versus-
Reflecting in the outward direction, as a concept of projection or the projected image of oneself. Symbolically, as the shadow. Although it’s the same concept of separate but connected, it’s the “lesser” way, or as a different reflective way.
The One’s shadow concept
The shadow level reflection, as in seeing one’s own shadow on the surface of the earth — described as the observable result of seeing one’s own silhouette.
This could also be classified as the faded projection of oneself… [sometimes — as a degree of falseness that a person projects]
As a relationship of the Light and the Dark, this is a transitional state or attribute of the faded/shaded area. The idea that both are part of a darkness, but also as a consequence of the light. Additionally, it serves as a guide to indicate the direction of the light source’s location [sometimes, as a guiding to or from reference].
Note: Maybe, even the idea of judgment of oneself, or symbolically the idea of one’s conscience — and which way the shadow is cast, is how one justifies one’s own actions — even the idea of one’s own bias. [If we are in the light, we also have a shadow.]
Also, there is the idea of “the full separation of it” — is One becoming Two (or as two other Ones)
Note: This can be described as the relationship between what was one and is now two, but not as the same as the original. The concept is that this relationship of the Three-Dimensional object is not the same as (or the idea of an opposing version), versus the Two-dimensional representation of it. It’s the concept of “Other.”
This ends up being a spectrum of separations: from the One, as the One’s reflection [as a representation of the original].
-to-
The idea of a clone (or copy) of the original — as the same, but also something different, like: Eve from the rib/side of Adam -or- not the born of or from something, but different, like: “the concept of offspring.”
-to-
The idea of something completely opposite or opposing, like:
[God vs. Satan]
Variants of these concepts being used and described are:
God to Man | Heaven to Earth | Darkness to Light | Good to Evil |
Meta or Non-Physical to Physical | Mind (Spirit) to Body (Flesh), etc….
The function of the Reflective process presents the concepts of the “Construct of Two” and coming from the “Construct of One.”
The relationship to word building
The function of the process of reflection in word building is the development of the 2-letter combination or pairing together. The pairing of two letters then becomes a “new one unit” or 2-letter word (but also just as a pairing unit of a concept).
Example:
(A) + (B) = (AB) / אב <H1> as: Father, Green[sprouts] and even, Fruit
Glyph meaning formula = God’s Plan – the vastness of Creation
(B) + (A) = (BA) / בא — not a word, but part of words inferring the concept of narrowing down, reducing, or restricting aspects, such as entrance ways, to dig, engrave, making a declaration, or pits (tar or slime), a well [of water], and even a dungeon.
Glyph meaning formula = Plan [Mind of] God
– the focusing in on or limitations of the aspects of God and relates to mankind’s attempt to do so [seems to be a connection to the commandment: “Not taking the Lord’s Name in Vain”]
The connection to the Seed Construct and Seed Glyph with the word relationship.
(A) + (N) = (AN) / אנ – concept of the Dry Seed or Potential
Glyph meaning formula = God’s Seed
– As the primal aspect of potential from God
(M) + (N) = (MN) / מנ as of the Watered Seed or Inspiration
Glyph meaning formula = Watered Seed
מנ <H5408> translated as: Manna [Food/Bread from Heaven] – also inferring inspiration from God, as the nourishment given to mankind.
(Ch) + (N) = (ChN) / חנ – as the Sprouting Seed or Outcome
Glyph meaning formula = Branching Seed
חנ (ChN) <H5480> translated as: Grace, Pleasant, Precious [diversity of Outcome] as: the vastness of plant-life from seeds.
— also, the reflection of this (NCh) translated as: Noah (as a New Seed or New Outcome from the Potential of Human Life after the Flood [a Watering Seed concept).
The perception in something being reflected can be thought of as “How it happens,” specifically the “effort” behind it.
The idea of a function within or as part of the reflective process, rather than a separate process.
In other words, the action of the development of words or within words.
Process 2
The “Effort” of [coming from] One becoming Two
(The One’s reflection parting from the One, or The One becoming Two)
Function of the Yud י [Y] = “The Effort”
Later in NT or Gospels as: Christian concept of “Works”
The function aspect of the placement of the letter Yud י (Y) as the “Effort” and how it effects the meaning.
The first example is the Yud י (Y) “Effort” and the Nun נ (N) “Seed/(Potential)” — symbolizes (or reflects) the “attempt to” sprout (or the process to sprout the seed) = (NY) also, as the transition from “watering of the seed” to become the “sprouting seed.”
Although the (NY) is not technically a word, it’s connected to a suggested root, ני (NY) from the actual word used once in Ezekiel, בניהמ (BNYHM) which translated as: wailing.
Note: Also, symbolic of the wailing during childbirth.
Other words, like: ניד (NYD) <H5205> translated as: quivering [of lips] | as meaning the motion [of lips].
Note: Also, symbolic of the vibration of an egg before it hatches and the shaking, unstable first steps of a child [or other animals].
Concept of Direction (as a Cycle of Life)
“Seed to Plant” | “Offspring to Parent”
Note: But when the comparison shifts from the Seed to Snake —the symbolic perception shifts to an image of a rattling of the tail before the strike/bite (and the wailing that is cried out from it).
– versus –
The reflective nature (the reversing order of the letters): (YN), as the “Efforts to bring forth the Seed” = as “the plant/tree produces the seed,” versus the “seed which brings forth the plant/tree.”
Concept of Direction (as a Cycle of Life)
“Plant to Seed” | “Parent to Offspring”
An example is בינ (BYN) <H996> = translated as: between, from, among
— used in Genesis 1:4 describing separation/division of light from darkness.
Glyph meaning formula: Blueprint/Plan → Effort → Seed (the Potential) / Sprouting Seed (Generations) / Snake (concept of the “living” river of time – or as the changing/evolving nature of things over time)
Generalized concept of “How things will eventually grow apart (independent/individual) from its source”
Biblical narrative examples like: Adam to Eve (from the Rib or side of Adam) — then later as their Offspring and their Generations: Abel/Cain, Ishmael/Isaac, Esau/Jacob, etc…
This concept can be understood in relation to both the Bet ב (B) “Blueprint/Plan” and the Nun נ (N) “Seed/Potential”. These two glyphs/letters reflect a common aspect of an earlier stage of something, such as the plan or potential to be more or to become more.
(B) + (N) = (BN) / בנ <H1121> translated as: Son [Offspring]
Glyph meaning formula = Blueprint/Plan of the “Seed”(the Potential) / Sprouting Seed (Generations) / Snake (concept of the “living” river of time – or as the changing/evolving nature of things over time).
Generalized concept of “How things will eventually grow apart (independent/individual) from their source”
– as the moment of beginning the process to do so, as in the Child of [someone or something], but will grow up into becoming their own [thing], but still connected (or related) and potentially influenced by its parents.
Another concept is Masculine and Feminine
There is also a relationship to the concept of Effort presented in a masculine attribute of “bringing forth” versus a feminine attribute of “giving birth.” In other words, the Father seeds in order to bring forth a child, but the Mother is that which gives birth to the child.
Introduction to Suffixes
(Masculine and Feminine)
The connection to masculine aspects and to the farming aspect of plowing and planting the seeds for crops which is also extended to the “Effort to bring forth Life,” in other words, linking to Glyph meanings of the Yud, י (Y) as “Effort” and Mem, מ (M) as “Life” = ימ (YM) as the masculine suffix or endings to words.
Whereas the ית (YT) is the feminine suffix to words, which is the glyph meaning of the “Effort to bring forth the Weaving together.” The visual imagery of weaving together a basket is the interwoven assembly of parts to create a complex unified object. This symbolizes a relationship, the “weaving of baskets -to- development of a baby [in the womb].”
These represent the two basic branches (or differences) of the concept of Being: as “created” [the masculine, as bringing forth] versus “begotten” [the feminine, as giving birth].
Process 3
The “Offspring(s)” – the Born from(s)
(The New Ones or Newborns)
Function of the Vav, ו [V] = “The Tethering”
Later in, NT or Gospels as: Christian concept of “Faith”
The function aspect of the placement of the letter Vav, ו (V) as the “Tethering” and how it effects the meaning.
This brings up another aspect of word building: the function of placement (location) letters in words, or what we now refer to as Prefixes, Suffixes, and Infixes.
A very common, but “lost (or hidden) in translation” function is the complexity of the letters as prefixes, especially with the Vav, ו (V).
Examples:
In English the translation outputs as multiple words → in Hebrew it’s written as one word with the extra letters acting as a prefix to a root word:
– Gen. 1:2 “And the earth…” → והארצ (VHARTs) = ו (V) “And” + ה (H) “the” + ארצ (ARTs) <H776> “earth”
– Gen. 1:3 “And said…” → ויאמר (VYAMR) = ו (V) “And” + י (Y) + אמר (AMR) <H559> “to speak, say, utter” | “said”
– Gen. 1:4 “And the saw…” → וירא (VYRA) = ו (V) “And” + י (Y) + האר (RAH) <H7200> “to see” | “saw”
– Gen. 1:5 “And the called…” → ויקרא (VYQRA) = ו (V) “And” + י (Y) + קרא (QRA) <H7121> “to call, proclaim, read, name” | “called”
Note: Every line in Genesis 1 after the first line begins this way. In fact it’s part of the ancient writing method.
Symbolically, the connection to the Glyph of the Tent Peg is the function of anchoring the base of the tent to the ground [as spaced apart, but functioning in a common purpose]. Also, like hammering nails in a board or anchoring a net in the water.
Note: This functions as, the way something is “tethered”/“connected” to the physical/”earthly” realm from the spiritual/divine/”heavenly realm.
The use of the (V) as an infix … the interaction of or with
Examples:
The Hebrew word, ימ (YM) <H3220>, defined as Seas [as the “Body of Water”] — generates a plural state or condition, like the plural yet fluid nature of it. The connection of the Glyph meaning as the “Effort of the Water” — symbolic of a “Flowing River.”
The interaction of the ו (V) as an infix generates the Hebrew word, יומ (YVM) <H3117> translated as: “Day”, many days, and an “Age.” The visual representation of the (YM) “Flowing River” as the concept of Time, and of a “Tent peg” or a stick poking out of the flowing river, and the disturbance from it on the water as the event in time.
Note: The symbolic nature of a solid object interacting with the flowing water and the disturbance it creates implies this word to represent a reactionary moment of life/truth (M), not as a single unit of time, but as an interaction with the flowing (Y), plural nature of it.
The word, אור (AVR) <H216>, translated as: “Light.”
Note: Symbolically, from the Glyphs represents the (A) “Mind of God” and the (R) “Mind of Man” and the (V) interaction = [God interacting with Man] is to be “illuminated” — “is to bring the light” and “into the light” from the darkness. [Also, represents the concept of the Unknown to Known (or Knowable) aspect of the“Mind of Man” from the “All-Knowing” aspect of the “Mind of God.”]
The even more interesting use of the (V) as a suffix … to hold back the nature of a word [it’s attached to].
Example:
The word, תהו (THV) <H8414> translated as: “formless.” – as (TH) is the concept of “form,” which is used in the word before this as היתה (HYTH) as, “was.” – used in Genesis 1:2 “And the earth was (THV) formless (HYTH) … [the concept of something exists in a form, but also the form is held back — the concept of possibility of having form but not yet there.]
Process 4
The Interaction with One becoming Two
(The One’s reflection reconnecting to the One
or The Two connecting to One)
“The Union” of “The Tethering” and “The Effort”
Function of the Vav, ו [V] and Yud, י [Y]
Later in NT or Gospels as: Christian concept of “Faith & Works”
Additionally, when the Vav, ו (V), and Yud, י (Y) are used together = וי (VY) as a prefix, they function symbolically like: the concept of a pregnancy. The ו (V) as the tethering of the umbilical cord or “conception,” and the ו (Y) is the effort of giving “birth.”
Note: The relationship of (VY) → now as, an outcome of what is being reflected = also, like a child attempts to reflect its parents. The concept of born from or the “tethering” from [the previous] thing.
Additionally, the function of the reflective process, like a mirror (or shadow) = as the “Greater -to- Lesser” relationship of the reflecting versus reflected.
Example:
The word, אמר (AMR) <H559> as “to say, speak, utter” – used 11 times in Genesis 1 as ויאמר (VYAMR) translated as: (V) as: “And or Then + (Y) [as the action of] + (AMR) [saying] as: “said”… [In this case, God speaking things into Creation.]
The Glyph meaning: Mind of God + Life + + Mind of Man
Note: The interesting use of letters used to make this word is (AM) translated as: “Mother” — The (V) as conception + the (Y) as giving birth + (AM) as Mother
Also, the relationship to the masculine ox to the feminine cow — and speaking as a method of creation and the similarity to the term [to utter = to speak] and the term [udder] to female cow [to provide milk for its young].
Concept of וי (VY) as “Conceived and Born”
Symbolically, “being Born” or “Giving Birth”
The idea of the initial moment of being inspired.
The Reflection of וי (VY) to יו (YV)
Concept of (Y) Effort to bring forth the (V)
or the (YV) “Effort to Conceive”
(Tethering to the Effort) = The idea of Sexual Intercourse
Example:
The Hebrew Name: Job, איוב (AYVB) <H347> from the Book of Job: the patriarch famous for his patience.
Note: The (YV) as the concept of “making the effort to conceive” within the (AB) <H1> translated as: “Father.”
The idea of a relationship to both concepts and to the Union of a Father and Mother to bring forth Offspring.
Additionally, going back to the Hebrew word, יומ (YVM) <H3117> translated as: “Day”, many days, and an Age.” — through the perspective of יו (YV) as the moment of conception and giving birth + מ (M) as “Life.”
The Process Concept
The overall concept of the process is based on the idea of Reflection, with its function being based on the (V) as “Connection/Relationship/Tethering” and the (Y) as “Action/Movement/Effort” within or how things interact with it.
The Overview
The complexity(intertwining) of the patterns
Reviewing the relationship of the pattern of the structures of the [Dry Seed/Watered Seed/Sprouting Seed – Flower/Pollinated Flower/Fruit – Adam/Union(Adam-Eve)/Offspring] and the pattern of the process aspects of Reflection/Tethering/Effort)Action as the transition between each stage.
There is a general idea of a duality of things, as something starting off as one thing then becoming another, but also with the duality of direction, as the placement of time and growth, versus creating something new.
The something “Lesser” becoming “Greater”
Seed to Sprout, Sprout to Plant (or Tree), Flower to Fruit, Offspring to Adult
The something “Greater” becoming “Lesser”
Plant (or Tree) producing Seeds [as an internal process], Parents producing Offspring [as a union of an external process]
The idea of something “Greater” and “Lesser” in the duality format. [Also, descriptions of the Sun and the Moon, as Day and Night.]
Although with the idea of being paired in a duality relationship, there is also the Concept of being a “Cycle” or formatted in a sequenced format.
Note: In the case of the cycle of the Sun (as the “Greater Light”) and the Moon (as the “Lesser Light”), which also generates a movement (as a passage of Time) and is expressed as the idea of marking the “Seasons.”
The Sun (Day) <bringer of Light> is connected to the warmth and life — also linked to Summer.
The Moon (Night) <bringer of Darkness> is connected to cooling down and death — also linked to the Winter.
Another connection to this duality is the representation of the aspects of Life and Creation, and the cycle aspect is presented the “Paths of…”
The “Path” of Life
“Plant to Seed” | “Parent to Offspring”
– versus –
“Seed to Plant” | “Offspring to Parent”
The idea of the fully developed is the “Greater” thing, and the “Lesser” thing is what reflects it — The growth in its development (direction) process [in relation to “Life”, or “Living”].
Concept of How things are expressed in the Earthly/Physical realm = Life = Living things
The idea of being fully developed is also the end of life = “death.”
The linguistic expression of this is linked to the Glyph/Letter: Mem, מ (M)
Glyph meaning: Life (and Truth)
and adding the cycling event as written as: ימ (YM)
Glyph meaning: Efforts to bring forth the Life.
Note: The functioning of the life cycle is observed as a splitting (or branching).
As the seed grows, it branches into roots and stalk; when the sprout grows, it forms branches.
As other life evolves, it functions by branching off into related variations, but each stem from a common predecessor (ancestor). [Aka: the Family Tree].
The concept of the branching is expressed as the Glyph/Letter: Chet, ח (Ch)
Glyph meaning: Branching(Diversity) of …
The “Path” of Creation
The idea of something reflecting as a “Greater” thing to a [“Lesser”] thing is also expressed in the relationship of the “Path of Creation” as the “Greater” and the “Path of Life” [“Lesser”], which it’s reflecting.
Concept of How things are expressed in the Heavenly/Divine/Meta-Physical realm
[Afterlife | non-Living things]
The linguistic expression of this is linked to the Glyph/Letter: Shin, ש (Sh)
Glyph meaning: Aspects of Creation (and Destruction)
and adding the cycling event as written as: יש (YSh)
Glyph meaning: Efforts to bring forth the Creation.
Note: The connection to the other worldly relationship to the patterns of all things and the human observation of them. In other words, the observation of everything around us. One of the early examples is the stars in the sky and the patterns they form, and how they map out the story of the divine path, extending to life unfolding reflectively. Another example is Prophecy and the connection it has to events in Life that repeat themselves in similar ways.
In other words, how we perceive the repeating patterns and what these reveals to us, or what this becomes in our connection or relationship to the divine realm.
This concept is linguistically expressed as the Glyph/Letter: Hey, ה (H)
Glyph meaning: Revealing/Revelation of …
The interplay of these letters is interesting: (M)/(Sh)/(H)/(Ch) and the words/Names they generate: Shem, HaShem, Moses, Messiah, Mashiach, Ham, etc… [Note: discussed in a later section]
The Formatting Structure
within these two concepts of “Paths.”
The Path of “Life” and its relationship to the Seed.
The relationship to the idea of how this is reflected in a Life structure is expressed in the seed format or the concept of the “Seed’s Journey,” which will grow into crops, which eventually lead to the “Harvest.”
Life format
The Seed’s Journey
as a “Path to the Harvest”
1 – Dry Seed — Concept of Potential
(as: inert, and an action is needed)
This represents both symbolically and actually the Concept of Potential (as stored up or storing up potential.
Other related concepts of this would be: 1) the concept of dehydration [the absence of water or the water removed]. 2) the concept of hibernation [going into a deep sleep-like state to get through the winter “harder times.”
The concept of Potential is connected to survival [weathering of “hard times”] — also, the idea of basic needs.
Note: There seems to be a hint at the idea of living in a desert (survival of the dryness and lack of water) –or– the idea of the suffering servant(s), and the positive that comes after such negative events/periods/states.
2 – Watered Seed — Concept of Inspiration
(as, exterior event [action] influencing the spark of life to begin)
[from the Darkness — or under the soil]
The triggering of germination or re-hydration | aka: the “watering.” As the relationship to the idea of bringing life back into something.
Note: The “rare” Fire germination plants – born/re-born “of fire” [and smoke] to aid in… fire-stimulated re-sprouting, flowering, seed release and germination)
An interesting relationship to types of germination and concept of water in Noah’s Flood and the fire in Revelation’s “Armageddon.”
3 – Sprouting Seed — Concept of Action(s) taken
(roots = downward directions) and choices (branching = upward directions)
The generalized life cycle of a seed (as a foundational state) is
separated into a basic growth process of these three steps.
The process continues as a symbolic path to get to the Harvest.
As a more complex version of the three stages.
4 – Plant/Tree — Concept of Structure (or System)
(as: the identification of what comes from the seed)
— as grass yielding herb plant/tree and bearing fruit [as described in Gen. 1:11]
5 – Grass-Herb/ Tree-Fruit — Concept of Outcome
(as: the Potential of Duality of Crops)
Grass to Flour (becomes Bread, etc…) | Flowers to Fruit
All of which is Food (Concept of Nourishment)
6 – “New” Seed(s)
The cycle repeats…
<As a beginning -to- end process, which is launches
a (or many “potential”) “New” beginning(s)>
The idea of a single seed branches into branching roots and
branching stalk & limbs [aka: “branches”]
-versus-
The Tree/Plant produces many seeds as a way to branch [itself] out into the world to become many more.
Note: The symbolic connection to ABRAM-Exalted Father becoming ABRAHAM-Father of the Multitude.
-or- Constructed of/on a “Fractal Framework” = <Fractal Repeating>
The concept of layering over time and of repeating the 3-stage process.
Symbolically, the Process of God bringing forth Creation, but as the “potential” or as God’s Seed = aka: אנ (AN), and “watered seed” as “God brings forth Life”= אמ (AM) [translated as: “Mother”], then growing into God’s Sprouting Seed, as the “actions taken” = אח (ACh) <translated as: “Brother”>.
Creation format
(as the 6 Days of Creation)
This process becomes part of a larger format of a repeating the reflection concept, while also aligning with the Life/Seed format.
Dry Seed = Day 1 [yom] echad, אחד (AChD)
Watered Seed = Day 2 [yom] sheni, שני (ShNY)
Sprouting Seed = Day 3 [yom] shelishi, שלישי (ShLYShY)
Plant/Tree = Day 4 [yom] rebii, רביעי (RBYaY)
Grass-Herb/ Tree-Fruit = Day 5 [yom] chamishi, חמישי (ChMYShY)
“New” Seed(s) = Day 6 [yom] hashishshi, הששי (HShShY)
Watered Seed 2 = Day 7 [yom] hashebii, השביעי (HShBYaY)
Day 1, or the “first day”
* Yom, יומ (YVM) <H3117> translated as: “Day”
Is the “flowing river” (YM) = The concept of Time – specifically, the interactions within the flowing river (YVM) = the interactions within Time— the visualization of this is the interacting within the flowing river [Time], and the what comes out of it or is brought forth from it, is the (A) Mind of God + (Ch) Branching/Sprouting(Diversity) from it, is the (D) Path/Way.
* Echad, אחד (AChD) translated as: “First/One”
– used in Genesis 1:5 And God called the light Day, and the darkness he called Night. And the evening and the morning were the first day.
Note: אח (ACh) <H251>
The Brother’s Path(s)/Way(s).
The idea of the “Story of Two Brothers” is a common trope or motif in many ancient cultures. Ex.: the Roman origin story involving Romulus and Remus; the ancient Egyptian myth called the Tale of the Two Brothers: Anubis/Bata; and, of course, the multiple versions in the Bible: Cain/Abel, Ishmael/Issac, Esau/Jacob. Other variations of this theme (concept of separation/splitting/duality) are expressed as Light/Darkness, Day/Night, Evening/Morning, Good/Evil, Greater/Lesser, and the Sun/Moon.
Day 2, or the “second day”
* Sheni, שני (ShNY) <H8145> translated as: “Second/Two”
– used in Genesis 1:8 And God called the firmament Heaven. And the evening and the morning were the second day.
Glyph meaning formula
Seed(s)/“Potential” <born within> Aspects of Creation’s + Efforts
-or- Aspect(s) of Creation for Generations (Seeds) to come and the Efforts they [the “Generations”] will <bring forth>.
Note: The perspective of Glyphs/Letters [Alphabet] as the Seeds — aka: The collective potential from within all/whole of creation.
The basic Concept of the “Push” or the “Nudge”
The idea of the impulse that nudges the directions one goes or the choices a person or people make in life.
Note: שי (ShY) <H7862> as: Gift → נ (N) Seed, as:
The Creation’s Fruit
The idea of the “Creation’s Effort” and the “Seed” within.
Symbolically similar to Genesis 1:11… the fruit tree yielding fruit after his kind, whose seed is in itself…
Day3, or the “third day”
* Shelishi, שלישי (ShNY) <H7992> translated as: “Third/Three”
– used in Genesis 1:13 And the evening and the morning were the third day.
Glyph meaning formula
Aspects of Creation + Learn/Teaching [Lessons] + Effort + Aspects of Creation + Effort
The idea of the directions one goes or the choices a person or people make in life.
Note: The ל (L) learning/lessons <born within> שי (ShY) = Language(s) + <bring forth> שי (ShY) Creation’s Efforts
The Fruits of our Labors
The idea of “taken in” of the Fruit or the eating of the Fruit.
Concept of what we learn from walking a path
— as the lessons gained from our way of life.
The idea that we will develop based on one’s own language (as well as the actions and choices we make).
Note: Besides the intertwining of how people live their lives and language. There is the intertwining and evolving of the function of language as: oral to written; glyphs to letters; 2-letter root words to 3-letter root words [as: seeds to fruits, whose seed is in itself].
Day 4, or the “forth day”
* Rebii, רביעי (RBYaY) <H7243> translated as: “Fourth/Four”
– used in Genesis 1:19 And the evening and the morning were the fourth day.
Glyph meaning formula
Mind of Man + Blueprint[Plan] + Effort + Observational + Effort
The idea of analyzing how people live their life(s), either as a group [tribe/nations] or as a personal reflection [self-reflecting].
Note: The title of a Rabbi is a term of a spiritual leader or religious teacher in Judaism. The Mishnaic Hebrew word רבי (RBY), meaning: Master. The connection to the רב (RB) <H7727> meaning and translated as: “abundance, many, great, chief, captain, etc…” + עי (aY) <H5856> translated as: “a ruin” [broken down into pieces].
The Great Breakdown through Observation
Note: Similar concepts to the use of making observations is the term from the Book of Enoch: The Watchers [the Book of the Watchers] – explaining the fall of the watchers and taking of wives and the birth of the Nephilim.
Day 5, or the “fifth day”
* Chamishi, חמישי (ChMYShY) <H7243> translated as: “Fifth/Five”
– used in Genesis 1:23 And the evening and the morning were the fifth day.
Glyph meaning formula
Branching (Diversity) + Truth/Life + Effort + Aspects of Creation + Effort
The idea of the many diverse efforts or actions coming from Life and Creation.
Note: The concept of much branching = ח (Ch) and the leading to <bring forth> מי (MY) → שי (ShY)
The Orchard [as the outcome of it]
The idea of “going into” then “coming out” of an Orchard
Concept of what we take away [from the lessons from walking a path].
Note: Similar concepts to the Trees of [Life and Knowledge], and the Kabbalah “Pardes” [translated as: “the orchard”].
Another concept connection to the diversity idea of (MY) and the (M) as the Glyph of Water – is the Fish [as what is making action in the water] versus the (ShY) connection to the Sky and the Birds [as what is making action in the sky].
The direct relationship to the biblical account of the fifth day:
Genesis 1:22 Then God blessed them and said, “Be fruitful and multiply and fill the waters of the seas, and let birds multiply on the earth.”
Symbolically, the branching of two paths: both the vastness of diversity of life, and the separation of Written vs. Spoken words.
Day 6, or the “sixth day”
* Hashishshi, הששי (HShShY) <H8345> translated as: “Sixth/Six”
– used in Genesis 1:31 And the evening and the morning were the sixth day.
Glyph meaning formula
Revealing + Aspects of Creation + Aspects of Creation + Effort
The idea of actions reveals intent.
Note: The הש (HSh) is the first two letters of Hashem and Heaven. Symbolic of the stage just before the מ (M) “Life” — The Revelation + Creation + שי (ShY) “Creations Effort”
<which is used in word of [Day] 3 and 5>
The Revealing Creation through Creation’s Efforts
Concept of the “How” we act, take action, or interact. The “What” we are willing to do & actually doing.
Is it for oneself, oneself only, or for others?
Ideas like: Do we behave like Animals or Humans?
(Are we behaving as “Elevated/Exalted” [above Animals]?)
Concept of the Garden [of Eden] versus the Orchard
[the Kabbalah “Pardes” story], which is a perception of what grew from the Garden, and what can be harvested from it.
<The younger version versus the older/later version of itself>
The idea of finding the way back into the “Garden [of Eden]” and discovering the saplings (or crops) are now all fully grown, aka: full of fruit <potentially an overwhelming state>.
The essential understanding is that it’s just a matter of harvesting [properly] and then replanting it for the next cycle.
Concept of (HSh) and what it reflects is the שה (ShH) <H7716> as: “a member of the flock, sheep, goat, young sheep or goat, and of course the “lamb.”
The idea of “what can be sacrificed” [aka: the Lamb] → “to bring forth something new” (ShY) = as Creating/Creation of something new by the Destruction of something else.
In the generalized way, the (HSh) is the “What is being Revealed by Creation” is being brought forth by (ShY) “the Actions of Creation,” as the “Patterns” [we can and have observed].
Note: the first word in Genesis 1 is Bereshit tyvarb (BRAShYT) = “In the Beginning” and the last word is Hashishshi, ycch (HShShY) = “Sixth/Six.” — Both have the (ShY) and also represent the concept of the First and the Last, Beginning and the End = As the 6 stages of the Effort(s) of Creation (ShY) and as the cycle (or cycling) of it.
Day 7, or the “seventh day”
Day 7, or the “seventh day”
* Hashebii, השביעי (HShBYaY) <H7637> translated as: “Seventh/Seven”
– used in Genesis 2:2 And on the seventh day God ended his work which he had made; and he rested on the seventh day from all his work which he had made.
Glyph meaning formula
Revealing + Aspects of Creation + Blueprint(Plan) + Effort → Observed + Effort
The idea of “Greater Reflection” [the Group as a Whole] or <from the “Bird’s Eye View”> versus “Lesser” [as “Self-Reflection”]
Note: The relationship of the Day 4 = רביעי (R+BYaY) versus the swapping of the (R) Mind of Man and the הש (HSh) <The first two letters of (HShM) “HaShem” – the meaning and concept of “The Name” as an informal reference to “God”>.
Thus, generating the word השביעי (HSh+BYaY)
(BY + aY) “Efforts Planned and then Observed”
The Revealing Creation through Origins and Observation
The basic Concept of the Final Judgment.
The idea of a How actions affect “Everything/Everyone” and as “Accountability.”
Overview of the Grammar Concept(s)
The repeated complexity, intertwining, and layering of the same patterns can be mind-blogging and overwhelming. This complexity begins to generate a perspective of chaos. As a method of bringing a perspective of order, a streamlined method of analysis can be applied by condensing down the general concepts of the vastness of the previous matrix of language patterns.
There is a connection to these patterns (or formats) and the Biblical Hebrew language, as a Process and Construct of Reflection.
Process vs. Construct
Process = as Divine/God’s Path(s) | Connection to the (Y)
[as God’s acts/perspective of the Divine/Heavenly Realm]
Construct = as Man’s Path(s) | Connection to the (V)
[as Man’s acts/perspective of being tethered to the Earthly Realm]
There is also the idea of the layering effect of the Seed to Man formats of the three stages, which is the perspective of Mankind, or the Way/(Path) of Mankind, and the tethering to Earth.
As the way to get to a concept of understanding or the deeper meaning of a word(s), there are basic concepts: God → Man (as, Reflection and Effort), and Masculine → Feminine (as, Branching and Tethering).
Summarized in four constructs (A simplified method of word analysis):
1 – Linear Construct
(Masculine force) <Creating, as bringing forth> Man (Adam) | “masculine reading”
2 – Dimensional Construct
(Feminine force) <Creating, as bringing forth> | Woman (Eve) | “feminine reading”
3 – Reflective Construct
The reverse order of letters of words – [to compare the function of meaning]
4 – Meaning Construct
(Spirit of God) <God’s interaction with Mankind> as the “Union of Minds”
